M3 Or Nsx - BMW Forum

sonny325i · 01-20-2005, 01:57 AM

which of the two do you guys think is better overall...especially in handling?...i know that the m3 is way faster...yet im still undecided ...wish i can get them both

used

M-TekNik · 01-20-2005, 02:05 AM

which year of the m3. i believe the nsx is faster than the E36 M3

24valve · 01-20-2005, 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sonny325i@Jan 20 2005, 12:57 AM
which of the two do you guys think is better overall...especially in handling?...i know that the m3 is way faster...yet im still undecided ...wish i can get them both used

[snapback]275419[/snapback]

While I love the M3, I don't believe it's quite in the same class as the NSX. The NSX has been hailed as one of the most solid supercars ever made, and handles and drives so well that you could teach your kid to drive in it.

sonny325i · 01-20-2005, 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sonny325i@Jan 20 2005, 01:57 AM
which of the two do you guys think is better overall...especially in handling?...i know that the m3 is way faster...yet im still undecided ...wish i can get them both used

[snapback]275419[/snapback]

2003 m3 or 2001 nsx

bmwforumerm3 · 01-20-2005, 12:33 PM

Oh man do I love the E36 m3...but the NSX will beat it...
It will beat it in the 1/4 it will beat it on the highway...the E36 will deffinetly keep close,just wont win.

Like i said my favorite car is the E36 m3...id take a cosmos black m3 with vaders and my personal mods over any e46 m3.

But ya NSX are fantastic...never ridden in one...but ive raced against them before...there buet's.

97alpineM3 · 01-20-2005, 12:39 PM

When its down to handeling... these are two different beasts... first off the M... which is a very versitile being by it self.... as for the NSX.. that thing was meant for performance... in todays standards.. the M3 (newer).. they are built around the driver.. and due to production needs and sales... they have also been catered to the lux... and visual candy market... A new M weights more than any other M ever produced in the sale class before it... as for the NSX... look at the thing.. I'm pretty sure they didnt give a rats ass about looks.. or eye candy.. yes it look decent.. but nothing that was consided in the making of the M3...

Good Luck because I wouldnt be able to choice... but if they were put infront of me.. both... for free.. I'd take the M for sure.. just cause its my life...

Les

PJV 528 · 01-20-2005, 12:41 PM

It would have to be the NSX

Live_the_Curves · 01-20-2005, 08:52 PM

I say the NSX, it will dominate overall. Its a complete package.

///M Dream · 01-20-2005, 10:30 PM

the thing i dont understand about nsx is that why would you make a v6 supercar?? yea i can understand its light and everything, but if you have the chance, why not drop a bigger v8 to make it a serious supercar contender??
the thing you need to understand is that you need to choose what the car is there for. if its there for attraction? the nsx's are pretty rare, at least where i live, then go with an nsx, but if you want attraction and pride, go with a beemer cause they are just plain hot!!

zeidakiss · 01-20-2005, 10:55 PM

i say nsx its acrazy car. my causin went in one and said it can do 80kmh in first gear.

2" class="inlineimg" />

Live_the_Curves · 01-21-2005, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ///M Dream@Jan 20 2005, 09:30 PM
the thing i dont understand about nsx is that why would you make a v6 supercar?? yea i can understand its light and everything, but if you have the chance, why not drop a bigger v8 to make it a serious supercar contender??
the thing you need to understand is that you need to choose what the car is there for. if its there for attraction? the nsx's are pretty rare, at least where i live, then go with an nsx, but if you want attraction and pride, go with a beemer cause they are just plain hot!!

[snapback]275847[/snapback]

The 911 TT is a V6 and I would buy anyday even over the Ferrari Modena 360

24valve · 01-21-2005, 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Live_the_Curves+Jan 20 2005, 11:01 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Live_the_Curves @ Jan 20 2005, 11:01 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-///M Dream@Jan 20 2005, 09:30 PM
the thing i dont understand about nsx is that why would you make a v6 supercar?? yea i can understand its light and everything, but if you have the chance, why not drop a bigger v8 to make it a serious supercar contender??
the thing you need to understand is that you need to choose what the car is there for. if its there for attraction? the nsx's are pretty rare, at least where i live, then go with an nsx, but if you want attraction and pride, go with a beemer cause they are just plain hot!!

[snapback]275847[/snapback]

The 911 TT is a V6 and I would buy anyday even over the Ferrari Modena 360

[snapback]275900[/snapback]

[/b][/quote]

The 911 TT is a flat-six.

M BMW · 01-21-2005, 07:39 PM

Hi. I would take the M3 over the NSX. More hp and a better car. I just like it.

Plus, the Ferrari is in it's own class. You can't compare it to any vehicle.

Thanks.
BYE.

SHAHAB323IS · 01-21-2005, 08:56 PM

dude wtf an m3 is half as much money as an nsx

i'd get the m3 only because it's cheaper and is a bmw

M BMW · 01-21-2005, 10:59 PM

Hi. The M3 is cheaper and has more hp than the NSX. Plus the NSX is an Acura, the M3 is a BMW. The M3 has made a name for itself.

Thanks.
BYE.