but it looks reallllly stupid if u have the front and the back at the same height.. the car looks nicer, not sure about how it handles, but it looks nice when the back is a little bit higher than the front
so you only dropped the front, eh? are the springs a lot harder in the front than the back now?? how is the handling? And is there a different aftermarket spring that is the same height, just harder? thanks.
I had considered just dropping the front of my car but decided against it and dropped the whole car, MUCH happier with it that way. I was afraid of the handling being unbalanced between the front and rear. I got some adjustable ground control coilovers and love them! And yes it looks way better in my opinion with the back dropped. In reality the suspension in the rear isnt any lower, its the fender itself is set lower on the body therefore making the wheel gap less in the rear...
__________________ -1998 BMW 540i6(Axis Penta 20's,M5 shadow grilles,trunk lip,led tails,oem front lip,PIAA lighting)
-2002 Cadillac Escalade(Zinik Luina 22's,OEM HID upgrade)
Spring companies design springs with different spring rates, that is not a problem. Having stiffer spring rates front or rear will change the handling, but that's just like changing to stiffer suspension up front or in the rear. However, what does change is the spring rates progessiveness. OEM Springs are very progressive, meaning they start out soft and get stiffer as they are compressed. Most aftermarket springs are still progressive, however the spring rates are a lot more linear, meaning they will start out stiff and continue to be stiff when the spring is compressed, there is very little change in the spring rate. That is going to give you some really funny handling. You're going to get 100 yards of squeeling understeer, it'll be like driving a FWD Honda. If you're going to do ghetto mods which obviously means you don't care about handling whatsoever, why not cut or heat your springs? :nana What most people do when they mix springs is for eg. putting H&R M3 rear springs on and H&R 325 front springs to get the more aggressive spring rate in the back. It's not just the ride height that changes, there are actually different design specs for each spring. Mixing springs of different brands is just foolish.
__________________ <u>1994 M-Technic M42 Saloon - Trillium Chapter - 5130</u> Stock - 2866lbs Current - 2670lbs
<a href='http://www.geocities.com/mtechnik42' target='_blank'>- VIEW MY MODS AND PICS</a>
<a href='http://www.automobile-technik.com' target='_blank'>- PARTS FOR SALE</a>
Well said, Autotecnica. However, you omitted one even *bigger* reason for not having a fully-coordinated set of shocks/springs front and rear: HARMONICS
I know that doesn't make sense...but hear me out. As you drive, your car goes over bumps and the up and down motion creates a frequency, much like a sound wave. When the front and rear frequencies are mis-matched, the car will go through strange oscillations. Engineers spend hours designing the car so that when you're driving at different speeds and going over bumps, the frequencies smooth themselves out.
Go try this. Have you ever driven on a concrete freeway at 55 and then again at 75? In my case, the expansion joints ar placed at a location that due to my 325s wheelbase and spring rate, it feels much smoother at 75 than at 55. (Autobahn tuning, thanks very much!)
Anyway, if you put a much higher spring rate in front and leave the rear stock, be prepared to experience strange oscillations and unpredictable handling. It is not advisable.
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.